From Awareness to Action: What Our Research Reveals About Psychological Safety at Work

Psychological safety has become one of the most talked-about topics in workplace culture, leadership, and safety management. It’s a simple yet powerful idea: employees feel safe speaking up, sharing dissenting opinions, and admitting mistakes without fear of retaliation or negative consequences. When psychological safety at work is a priority, teams innovate faster, leaders earn trust, and workplaces become safer and more engaging.

Experts are also looking at the link between psychological safety at work and the mental health of workers. In NSC’s 2025 State of Safety publication, mental health ranked third in the list of the 10 biggest challenges the occupational safety and health field needs to address over the next 5-10 years.

However, despite its rising profile, our recent research across various industries reveals a gap between awareness and actual implementation. Organizations are starting to recognize the importance of psychological safety, but many have yet to embed it into policies, training, and leadership practices.

Here’s what we learned from surveying hundreds of employees about their familiarity with psychological safety, how their organizations address it, and how it relates to engagement and safety outcomes.

Awareness Is Rising, But Not Fully Embedded

The good news: nearly six out of ten respondents said they were at least somewhat familiar with the concept of psychological safety, and nearly one-third reported being very familiar. The less encouraging news: Almost half said their organization had no definition of psychological safety at work at all.

This disconnect shows up even more clearly in policy adoption. Only 16% of respondents reported that their company has a written policy addressing psychological safety, while 51% said no policy exists. Another 22% indicated one is in development.

The takeaway? Awareness is spreading, but organizations aren’t yet taking the crucial step of formalizing psychological safety into governance, communication, and everyday expectations.

Training and Education Remain Limited

Training is another area where organizations are lagging. Over half of respondents said their company does not offer any formal training or workshops on psychological safety at work. Just 19% said training was available for all employees, and a mere 2% reported programs specifically for leaders.

This lack of structured education represents a missed opportunity. While policies set expectations, training equips employees with the skills and confidence to act on them, whether that means raising a safety concern, admitting an error, or respectfully challenging a decision.

Leadership Is the Make-or-Break Factor for Psychological Safety at Work

The strongest theme from the data is the role of leadership. Employees overwhelmingly linked their sense of psychological safety at work to how leaders behave day to day.

When asked how well leadership promotes psychologically safe behaviors, one-third of respondents said “very well,” nearly half said “moderately well,” and 19% said “not at all well.” This matters because leadership behavior strongly correlates with employee comfort in speaking up. In fact, 63% of employees said they feel very comfortable expressing dissenting opinions or concerns. However, this comfort tends to align closely with leaders who actively listen, respond constructively, and model vulnerability.

The research confirms what we already know: psychological safety at work is built or broken by leaders.

The Link to Engagement and Satisfaction

Employees also recognized the broader value of psychological safety at work. 38% of respondents said there is at least a moderate correlation between psychological safety and employee engagement or satisfaction, with 30% calling it a strong correlation.

That connection is critical. When employees feel heard and respected, they are more invested in their work, more collaborative, and more attentive; qualities that directly improve both safety and productivity. Psychological safety isn’t just a cultural aspiration; it’s a driver of business results.

Barriers Still Hold Organizations Back

Despite encouraging progress, the data also highlight persistent barriers. Fear of retribution, inconsistent leadership behavior, and production pressure all surfaced as challenges. For example, organizations that prioritize output over process often unintentionally discourage employees from reporting hazards or slowing down for safety reasons.

These tensions are not new—but they underscore why psychological safety can’t remain an abstract concept. It must be woven into how organizations set targets, evaluate performance, and reward behavior.

Psychological Safety at Work: Moving from Awareness to Action

The research suggests that organizations should focus on five priority areas:

Targeted leadership development to equip leaders with skills like active listening, empathetic feedback, and non-punitive responses.

Non-punitive reporting systems that ensure employees can speak up without fear.

Alignment of production and safety goals so efficiency never comes at the expense of well-being.

Clear, accessible policies that go beyond documentation to active communication.

Continuous monitoring through anonymous feedback and safety observation programs.

By taking these steps, organizations can close the gap between awareness and implementation. This ensures that psychological safety is not just a buzzword, but a lived experience for employees at every level.

Final Thoughts

The findings are clear: psychological safety at work is no longer optional. It is a cornerstone of modern workplace culture, a driver of engagement and satisfaction, and a vital element of safety performance.

Organizations that take psychological safety seriously—formalizing policies, investing in training, and empowering leaders—will not only protect their employees but also unlock stronger business outcomes. The next step is moving from recognition to action.

Contact us today